Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Out of reach…? Invite Him to have a seat beside you!


                As Christians, we believe Jesus is both human and divine at the same time, the Great Paradox. (Paradox Sept 2014 post)  If your thoughts are similar to mine, I place Jesus on the divine pedestal, the untouchable miracle worker, the savior, putting dimensions into which I cannot relate to His humanity.  I fail to put the human and the divine in Jesus together… and I fail to find it in myself.  Here in lies my problem; I distance Jesus beyond relational, inserted into a hierarchical model, He with the upper hand delivering to lowly me. We have a dysfunctional relationship.  We have more of an agreement to terms … terms I always fail to live up to and unfortunately His position elevates to be unapproachable.  If this configuration existed with my spouse or dear friends, our relationships would be unhealthy.  When I consider my friendships and those I love dearly in relationships, neither I nor those in relation have an upper hand.  We share without an element of power to create genuine, sincere bonds.  So … where does this leave my relationship with Jesus, the Great Paradox

Thursday, July 23, 2015

The Bible and Prayer


by Fred Vilbig

When St. Augustine was in Milan at the time of his conversion, he heard someone say, “Tolle, lege,” or in English, “Take, read.” He went to his room, opened his Bible, and read, “It is the hour for you to awake from sleep …. [P]ut on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the desires of the flesh.” Rom. 13:14-15. And he never turned back.

Early in his ministry, St. Francis asked a priest to randomly open the Gospels three times and read the first verses that he saw. They were Matthew 19:21, Luke 9:3, and Matthew 16:24, basically telling him to sell what he had, give everything to the poor, and follow Jesus. And that’s what he did … for the rest of his life.

Many saints have had similar experiences where God has spoken to them through the Bible.

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Sea Change


by Fred Vilbig

I feel compelled to write an article about the Supreme Court’s recent decision on same-sex “marriage”, Obergefell v. Hodges.

It is not because I believe the decision was profoundly wrong for moral reasons, which I will assert to anyone. The Court has made and will continue to make bad decisions. See, Dred Scott v. Sandford.

It is not because the opinion (which I’ve admittedly only read once very quickly) reads more like a college sociology paper than a legal opinion. Legal opinions start by analyzing prior law and reach a conclusion. College sociology papers start with a stated position, and then seek to justify it. The Supreme Court’s opinion reads a lot like the latter.

Rather, I feel compelled to write about the decision’s basic holding and the threat it poses to faithful Catholics and other faithful Christians. What the Court holds is that people of the same sex have a constitutional right to marry. The reverse of this statement is that it is unconstitutional to deny a person the right to marry someone of the same sex. This a sea change.

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

a footnote ...

                                      
   "You’ve never had my fried chicken,” my excited great-aunt Mary proclaimed.  “See you. Sunday. You’ll taste the best fried chicken in town!”
     Our phone conversation concluded.  Aunt Mary was wrong.  She did serve the best fried chicken in town.  However, she’d forgotten she’d hosted me the previous Sunday for her chicken dinner.  Little did I know as a seventeen year old, new to Salina, Kansas, alone working the summer before college for the State grain inspection department that Aunt Mary showed signs of Alzheimer’s or dementia beginning. 
     The disease progressed as my graduate years emerged from undergraduate work to cancer research at KU Med.  As I passed through Salina, I’d stop to visit Mary as often as I could.  Months often lapsed between my visits to her Senior Living Center.  Mary struggled to recognize me.  I could understand how she might not recall me because I was not part of her long term memory having only grown to know her that summer before entering college.  She lived in a simple grandma house with a postage stamp yard.  Widowed for many years, she always gave to me so generously with several Sunday meals.  Despite her disease, I was determined to communicate with her in some meaningful way even if she could not recognize me.
     I convinced a retiring KU professor to allow me to enroll in a graduate “Psychology of the Aging” class though I had completed no prerequisites for it nor did it have anything to do with my biochemistry research.   I enjoyed the class discovering, by far, the vast majority of seniors live productive, independent lives … but what about my Aunt Mary?  During one particular class pertaining to dementia, clinicians discussed various effective techniques such as music therapy, games, crafts, etc. used to steer clients away from episodes in which they described communicating through dreams or in silence with a dead spouse, friends, children, siblings, a foe or two and even God.  An “*” appeared referencing a footnote at the bottom of the page in our authoritative text.  Though quite common in this aging population, it was recommended that diversion using the techniques above be attempted for the benefit of the individual.  Whose benefit?  Mine, the therapist or Aunt Mary’s?  What if the experience commands more than a footnote, certainly not a diversion?
     I expected more on this topic as I flipped wildly through the remaining pages.  Nothing … simply a footnote … and this situation was the entire reason I enrolled in this class.  So consuming, I set out to discover what I could about these “imaginings.”  I found little until I stumbled upon an insignificant paperback addressing birth and its similarities to later life.  Inspired, I worked through the night deriving parallels in a theory.    Morning arrived quickly.  Soaked in a torrential rain, I dashed to my professor’s office, 7:30 am, and begged to address the footnote from days earlier.  “I only need 10 minutes.”
     “It’s my last day.  I have critical material to squeeze in.  Several students have questions.”  He looked kindly upon my drenched frame.  “You’re not even a credible psych student.  It isn’t going to happen.”
     Discouraged in the early hour, I listened to my professor cram two hours of final material.  With fifteen minutes remaining, he paused abruptly.  “Normally I’d entertain questions at this time, but one of your classmates has brought some interesting material to my attention and I think it worthy to see.”  Without salutation, he humbly turned the small auditorium over to me.  On a chalkboard on wheels, I sketched the large graph below which I had adapted from the book I’d come across about birth and life after.
     Our lives do not follow the clean lines or curves I’ve shown in this graph.  For example, there are young lives lost far too soon.  (In fact, all dimensions of my life follow the yellow squiggles, anything, but straight.)However, most folks do experience lives on some average as shown.  From conception to birth, an infant develops to leave the comfort of mother’s shelter to life in a new world unknown to the infant.  As Aunt Mary aged, her independence, invincibility, control, physical health (and many more 'youthful' characteristics) diminished.  While at the same time,  her spirituality, relationship to the Lord, communicating in a unique way expanded … and … in her new relationship it became more personal, more difficult for me to understand or to participate other than to observe and to listen, perhaps similar to Peter’s, James' and John’s reactions at the transfiguration.  “Rabbi, how good it is for us to be here!   Mk 9:5.  One must surrender “control” or invincibility to enter the new relationship.  On many occasions, staff would mention Mary displayed a certain peace after I’d visit … and all I did was listen and ask the occasional question to foster our conversation.  Mary’s experience and many like her may be more significant than a footnote!

      For anyone who has lost, I found this poem to be beautiful.  Its words encouraged me to write this reflection.

My Beloved   by Heather Heath Reed, … best read slowly.

He had come home to die
in his own bed,
surrounded by his books and flowers,
his sweetheart by his side.
It was always understood
that she would die first,
it was non-negotiable, she’d said,
subject closed.
                Now, he was asking her to let him go,
                and she felt cheated and afraid.
                Watching the night sky fill with stars,
                he become the consoler,
                his work nearly done, hers just beginning.
                Bit by bit, he helped her remember
                their lifetime together,
                spirited soulmates,
                raising kids and traveling the world
                mostly with laughter, always with love.
With one last breath, he slipped away
while she slept beside him.
Later, she would awaken
to the scent of yellow roses.